Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #48 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-12 16:18:00 EDT --- Since the discussion on fedora-packaging seems to have ceased without reaching a conclusion and there isn't a need to be able to have many versions of Gromacs concurrently installed, I have removed the support for environment-modules and just renamed all binaries to start with g_ . Since everything resides in standard locations the package should now be acceptable for distribution, please review. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm gromacs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/gromacs4 gromacs-csh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized csh GROMACS support gromacs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-tutor.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized zsh GROMACS support 12 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
