Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 --- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-22 15:51:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Please tell on fedora-devel that you are orphaning vnc, maybe there will > > be takers (for F11). If so, I think that it would be better in any case to > > have a regular review done, so keeping this closed and not reviewed is the > > best solution in my opinion. > > Well, this is not solution. tightvnc is forked vnc so both packages have same > code, same binaries etc. So we have to have vnc or tightvnc but not both. They can be made parallel installable and use alternatives, for example. Or simply have realvnc binaries prefixed. You are orphaning vnc, please follow the procedures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
