Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 23:10:43 EDT --- Looks good. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=940203 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. Source tarball matches upstream: a9dcfaa89e6b3ee52e0bb6e2d6b6c438 boolean-0.20.tar.gz a9dcfaa89e6b3ee52e0bb6e2d6b6c438 boolean-0.20.tar.gz.srpm =====> perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(boolean) = 0.20 perl-boolean = 0.20-2.fc9 ====> requires for perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9.noarch.rpm perl >= 0:5.005003 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(base) perl(strict) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
