Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-27 01:59:38 EDT --- Thanks for the explanation for the situation on this package. >From your explanation the license fix is not needed. (But the license tag on the spec file needs fixing, it should be "License: GPLv2 and GPLv3+". Would you fix that? I will check the other issues on your srpm (if any) later, however as currently I am on semi- vacation and the response from me may be less frequent.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
