Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-06 08:15:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This code seems to be confused about how it is licensed. Note that the > LICENSE > file contains the LGPL (v2) but the code itself says: > * This code may be freely redistributed under the terms of the > * GNU General Public License. > and this agrees with the README: > This software may be freely distributed under the terms of > the GNU General Public License (GPL). > > No version is specified anywhere, so GPL+ would seem to apply. Can you > clarify > with upstream? For the moment I changed the license to GPL+ while I'm waiting for an answer from upstream. > This also suffers from the compiler flags problem; easily fixed by changing > the > make line to: > make CCFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} fixed Here are the new files. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping-1.3.4-2.fc9.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=983765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
