Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-08 06:25 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint clean - package and spec naming OK - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds OK on FC4 (i386) and in mock for rawhide (i386) - no locales, libraries, subpackages or pkgconfigs to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions problems - no duplicate files - code, not content - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no desktop entry needed - no scriptlets Needswork: - license is same as perl (i.e. GPL or Artistic), not just Artistic - redundant BR perl (listed in exceptions section of packaging guidelines) - redundant BR's perl(Test::More) and perl(Test::Harness) - both modules are bundled with perl Suggestions: - use %{?_smp_mflags} with make in %build - "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';'" not needed for noarch packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
