On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:23:18 +0100, Anders Rayner-Karlsson wrote: > It would not perchance be BZ#540330 you're hitting would it? > > Worth checking what the size is of libvirtd periodically perhaps, if > nothing else, to rule out that it's this BZ. > Just my ยข2 :) > /Anders
I think it is exactly it... ;-( On my server I have now PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2904 root 19 -1 10.6g 9.8g 2712 S 0.0 83.6 16:12.42 libvirtd [r...@virtfed ~]# ps -eo rss,pid,cmd|egrep libvirtd|egrep -v egrep 10309532 2904 libvirtd --daemon --listen Based on bugzilla info, in the mean time I restarted libvirtd. I'm going to follow the bug and add my data to it... Thanks for the pointer! Gianluca _______________________________________________ Fedora-virt mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt
