Wouldn't that be "irp" for the marginal? If not, may I suggest that suddenly this makes Houdini and
Penn & Teller viable conversations? Sorry, rip. I'll rebut with the basic standard retort. I am
not here to talk about other interests. Ray had his say on Apple and the thread died. Starting it
anew isn't appropriate. Frankly I'm sick to death of the Steve Jobs topic.
-James
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Williamson" <[email protected]>
To: "feistfans-l" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: The economist cover oct 8-14
I admit the image file was Bad. Bad bad bad. Shame on you. Drop and
give me 20.
But I have to call "marginally" on-topic. Anything that uses the word
"Magician" on the cover...
hm... yeah, sure. why not?
:)
rip
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 20:35, James Young <[email protected]> wrote:
No (image) files.
No starting off topic conversations.
