It's not about demystifying anything nor us telling you what to write. Its your fans letting you know what they would enjoy reading as well as what you already put out. You obviously like the accolades that you get, yet you seem critical when a fan or two voice there opinion about seeing something you may or may not have thought about. Fans like stuff that never gets touched, look at the last star trek show. Despite the clamour of the fans it still got cancelled, same with firefly. And truly its not about demystifying the character but learning more about intriguing characters you have created and caputured our intrest with. So why not just say you would not write something instead of telling us you don't wish to be told what to write when it was a suggestion not an order, we know this isn't burger king and we don't always get it our way.
- Re: Macros Tim Hickey
- Re: Macros Nick Andrews
- Re: Macros Jeff Goodhall
- Re: Macros John Buttimer
- Re: Macros Noah P. Melnick
- Re: Macros Nick Andrews
- Re: Macros John Buttimer
- Re: Macros Raymond Feist
- Re: Macros - added spoiler for ACI (if you haven... Tony Joyce
- Re: Macros - added spoiler for ACI (if you haven... Raymond Feist
- Re: Macros - added spoiler for ACI (if you haven... John Buttimer
- Re: Macros - added spoiler for ACI (if you haven... Raymond Feist
- Re: Macros - added spoiler for ACI (if you haven... Tommy Holden
- Re: Macros - added spoiler for ACI (if you haven... Anestis Kozakis
- Re: Macros - added spoiler for ACI (if you haven... Nick Andrews
- Re: Macros - added spoiler for ACI (if you haven... Nick Andrews
- Re: Macros - spoiler removed Dan Henby
- Re: Macros - spoiler removed alexander . peck
- Re: Macros Paul Dutton
- Re: Macros Nick Andrews
- Re: Macros Noah P. Melnick
