Why is it when someone disagrees with people on the internet they call it trolling. It's an honest evaluation on my part and I still love Ray. It's why I don't even read blogs because it always comes down to screaming or stupid people screaming troll.
Lorn ________________________________ From: Nat Russo <[email protected]> To: feistfans-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 1:04 PM Subject: Re: Macros Trolling takes more skill than that :) #ISeeWhatYouDidThere On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Lorn Faulkner <[email protected]> wrote: Ray, > > >I'd love to see you write about something new and different if you aren't into >it or planning already. For me, it looks as if you've pretty much gotten >bored with Midkemia and writing about it. At least that's how your writing >comes across. > >Lorn > > > > >________________________________ > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >To: feistfans-l <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:31 PM >Subject: Re: Macros > > > >Hello everyone! > >Just off vacation so I'm a little behind on emails, basically turned off my >phone to spend the week on the beach! :) > >Ray, > >In its own way I consider all the questions (and suggestions for future >writings) a complement! You've written such great stories that none of your >fans here or else where can bear the thought of you NOT WRITING! Aghast!!! > >I know it gets tiresome but hopefully you'll consider it a another gold star >for a job well done! > >As always thanks for that first time you picked up a pen and starting >writing!!! > >Shells:) > > >Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® > >-----Original Message----- >From: Raymond Feist <[email protected]> >Sender: [email protected] >Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 14:04:54 >To: feistfans-l<[email protected]> >Reply-To: "feistfans-l" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Macros > > >On Jul 9, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Nick Andrews wrote: > >> What about a bio on Macros from Banath's point of view? >> > >Oh how about you get back to the part where I say I don't like being told what >to write? > >It's pointless, folks. I do what I do, and often if I was to do as you ask, >it would be killing all the dramatic balance I used to make the character >interesting. It's the whole "ignore the man behind the curtain" thing. > >I got an e-mail from someone asking why I killed off Admiral Vykor in Rage, and took me to task because he was so interesting. I loved it, because there was NOTHING else I wanted to do with that guy or knew about him, but it meant he was exactly doing what I wanted. > >That's the art of it, don't you see? > >Best, R.E.F. >---- >www.crydee.com > >Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by >stupidity. > > > > > > > > > > -- Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.
