Oh Dear, I do have to grin though, because if your enjoying and anticipating a book like this (even as a proof reader) im sure there would be lots of things missed especially in the exciting parts LOL. <--- notice i would never make a good proof reader. Lani Oh, ummmmm i know its hasnt been 30yrs since i stopped smoking but this final book...is it a big enough excuse for a cigar Ray??????
From: [email protected] Subject: Re: Possible error in Magician's End (Spoiler) Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 06:19:16 -0700 To: [email protected] Yup. It's there in the final text. Sigh. Best, R.E.F. On May 1, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Anestis Kozakis <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Ray, I was reading through the first five chapters of Magician's End at http://harpervoyagerbooks.com/2013/04/30/first-five-chapters-of-feists-magicians-end/ and I think I have found an error. Warning. Spoilers Abound. SPOILER SP AC E At the start of Chapter 4, near the end of the third paragraph: "And Martin didn't wish to explain to Prince Edward why two of the last three remaining conDoin brothers were no longer among the living." I am thinking that should be Sergeant Oaks, not Martin, considering Martin is one of those conDoins mentioned. Anestis. -- Anestis Kozakis | [email protected] ----www.crydee.com Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
