+1

Upayavira

Richard S. Hall wrote:
> I think it is about time we made a final decision on our SVN repository
> structure. According to my understanding of the situation, it seems like
> we have gravitated toward a Maven-like subproject structure. Thus, I
> propose we finalize the overall repository structure as follows (example
> subproject shown):
> 
>   felix/
>      trunk/
>         org.apache.felix.framework/
>         org.apache.felix.shell/
>         org.apache.felix.shell.tui/
>         org.apache.felix.prefs.jndi/
>         ...
>      releases/
>         org.apache.felix.framework-0.8.0/
>         org.apache.felix.shell-1.0.0/
>         org.apache.felix.shell-1.0.1/
>         ...
>      sandbox/
>         tbennett/
>         erodriquez/
>         akarasulu/
>         ...
> 
> The trunk/ directory contains a subdirectory for each subproject with
> the subproject's directory being named after the subproject's root
> package. The releases/ directory contains release snapshots of the
> subprojects. The sandbox/ directory contains directories for developer
> experimentation.
> 
> Each individual subproject will have the following Maven 2 structure:
> 
>   org.apache.felix.<subproject>/
>      src/
>         main/
>            java/
>               org/apache/felix/...
>            resources/
>         test/
>            java/
>               org/apache/felix/...
>            resources/
> 
> [   ] +1 Accept SVN repository structure.
> [   ]  0 Does not matter to me.
> [   ] -1 Reject SVN repository structure.
> 
> -> richard
> 
> 

Reply via email to