I just mimicked what was there,
me too :)
Furthermore, we might want to categorize the subprojects:
- framework;
- bundles;
- examples.
about the grouping we also have some example and I maintained the same
package structure we used in Domoware:
(bundle) org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver
(bundle) org.apache.felix.upnp.extra
(tool) org.apache.felix.upnp.tester
(example) org.apache.felix.upnp.sample.tv
(example) org.apache.felix.upnp.sample.clock
(example) org.apache.felix.upnp.sample.binaryLight
I wonder if the examples should be "bundled" with the bundles or not.
bundles->example vs examples->bundle
It's true that we'll integrate UPnP examples with other OSGi service,
for instance using the HTTPservice in order to implement the
Presentation aspects of UPnP devices, but on the contrary if somebody is
interested to UPnP only it could be a tedious work do a search or also
build all the examples.
francesco
