> About adding names to the source: I think that's a good idea, so at
> least if you look at the source you can see who created it. Of course
> svn blame like reports give a much better picture, but that takes more
> effort too.

Please don't. This will make everything more complicated. As you say,
svn is better suited to this kind of stuff in regard to IP and blame
issues and I don't think it is important to see who created something
in the actual file. Names of people to note should go to the NOTICE
file.

> In theory, adding the role of "tester" might be a good idea, but I'm not
> sure if we can find any. :)

How's a "tester" different then a "user" ?

regards,

Karl

--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to