Simon,
That is a good point...we do use the JDK1.2 version of Jetty inside our
bundle to ensure that it can run on small devices and/or old JVMs.
Bummer about that. Perhaps we will have to keep the current version
around as an alternative for those that cannot use JDK1.4.
-> richard
Kaegi, Simon wrote:
Hi Rob,
I'm sure the Jetty guys would suggest going with Jetty 6 as I think
they're getting quite close to RC0.
If you can I'd go with it.
That said, (and I'm not sure that this is necessarily an issue but...)
one thing that might shape your decision is that Jetty 6 requires JDK
1.4. For comparison, Jetty 5.1 sets the bar pretty low at JDK 1.2.
-Simon
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 4:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Poll - updating HTTP to newer jetty
I'm interested in views on updating our http to a newer Jetty version
- a 5.x release will probably be a fairly painless move,
since the architecture hasn't changed much
- a 6.x will probably take more effort, but also mean we
catch the "next wave" of Jetty optimisations early
Anyone got any views/preferences - not sure I'll get time to
do both, and although it's riskier since 6.0 is still in
alpha it also seems to have more long term mileage in it.
Anyone wanting a "stable" http can still use the current 4.x
if they're not ready for the change.
Thoughts?
-- Rob
Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44 (0)20 7488 3470
www.ascert.com
This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you.
