Richard S. Hall wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
I am trying to keep track of the upcoming votes that we need. As far
as I can see, we have the following:
1. JMX contribution from INSA-LYON.
2. JMX contribution from DIT UPM.
3. Log Service contribution from Dale Peakall.
4. Repository restructuring using artifactId.
Are there any others that I am missing at this point?
Are there any issues surrounding any of these that needs to be discussed?
Regarding (4), I would like to move on this as quickly as possible. To
some degree it is tied to our discussion on bundle JAR file naming.
However, we can ignore that issue for now and just rename the repository
subproject directories and not change the artifactId until we have made
a decision about how we want to handle that.
With my Maven hat on I would recommend that the directory name is the
same as the artifact id. Making them the same it will make your life
easier because Maven will usually append the artifact id on the site,
and scm urls.
--
Trygve
- Re: Repository restructure (Was: Re: Upcoming votes) Trygve Laugstøl
-