Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/29/2006 03:23:17 AM: > Any suggestions on how we should deal with Maven vs Eclipse naming?? Do we > need to care?
IMHO we do need to care. This is a case of less is more. The Eclipse community has developed a naming convention for its bundle JARs. As far as I know, Maven does not have a convention since it covers a very wide spectrum of usecases. In the particular case of Felix bundle JARs you are currently formulating your convention. For reasons outlined in another post and considering value of presenting just one naming convention to the consumers of OSGi technology I suggest that Felix use the same approach as is used in Eclipse. Of course I am biased here but my heart is really with the consumers on this. Less is more. FQDN_version.jar is widely used, simple to describe, easy to understand and implement. Jeff
