Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>> It seems like we could just remove the offending code with the
>> dependency until it is resolved if this were going to hold up graduation.
>
> What offending code though? Referencing the javax.microedition classes
> seems fine from the licence terms of the JSR 139 specification? It includes:
>
> Sun Microsystems, Inc. ("Sun") hereby grants you a
> fully-paid, non-exclusive, non-transferable,
> worldwide, limited license (without the right to
> sublicense), under the Sun's applicable
> intellectual property rights to view, download,
> use and reproduce the Specification only for the
> purpose of internal evaluation, which shall be
> understood to include developing applications
> intended to run on an implementation of the
> Specification provided that such applications do
> not themselves implement any portion(s) of the
> Specification.
>
> JSR-000139 Connected Limited Device Configuration 1.1
> (Final Release)
>
> http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr139/index.html
> follow the links to download the spec and then review licence.
"without the right to sublicense"
Isn't that enough to scupper us?
Upayavira
