Huh? If the file was modified in 2005 shouldn't the 2nd copyright year be
updated to 2005?
I was the one that changed the copyright year when I "reduced" the servlet 2.4
code to 2.1 level.
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788
----- Original Message -----
From: Enrique Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09/18/2006 08:17 AM
To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Graduation vs. release
Richard S. Hall wrote:
...
I think all of the above subprojects are ready to go as is with respect
to their functionality. The following is a list of some loose ends that
need to be tied up:
* Fix all headers to meet the requirements defined in
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html.
* Create an appropriate LICENSE file.
* Create an appropriate NOTICE file.
* Determine how the OSGi interface source and classes must be handled.
* Determine version numbers for subprojects, especially those that
will be released along with the framework.
* If we release bundle repository as part of the framework install,
then determine what we will do for the repository.
...
Comments on the above and on things that I am forgetting are welcome.
On the incubator list they also pointed out that the copyright years
were altered on the forked servlet code from Tomcat:
"
It also seems that Felix has forked Tomcat's servlet code - which is okay:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/felix/trunk/javax.servlet/src/main/java/javax/servlet/GenericServlet.java
However, the copyright years have been altered from the original file
- removing 2004 and adding 2005 - which isn't okay:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/servletapi/branches/servlet2.3-jsp1.2-tc4.x/src/share/javax/servlet/GenericServlet.java
"
Enrique
