[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-147?page=comments#action_12439868 ] Francesco Furfari commented on FELIX-147: -----------------------------------------
Exactly, what do you think about the following additions: *subproject*, *updated source headers*, *notice file*, *third-party license* (if required), *documentation*, *ready for release*, *checked* Where "notice file", "third-party license", and "documantation" could be pointers to the cvs/wiki site, "ready for release" a flag indicating that all the needed actions have been completed by some guy, and "checked" a double check done by another person. Ya, a double check could be an excessive prudence ... you know in Italy we have a lot of bureaucracy ;-) > Determine how to handle OSGi source and classes for release > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FELIX-147 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-147 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Richard S. Hall > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.8.0 > > > We need to make sure we understand what we can and cannot do with the OSGi > sources and/or class files. For example, can we include the OSGi source in > our release...I assume we can include the OSGi binaries without any issue. > This is a third-party issue, so we need to make sure that we understand what > is necessary with respect to our NOTICE file, etc. Most of this is discussed > in http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html and also in > http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
