Let me know if I can help or if you have ideas for improvement.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
PN> Ok,
PN> great, we will take a look at the BND plugin!
PN> /peter
PN> On 11/30/06, Peter Kriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There are no outstanding issues as far as I know.
>>
>> If you use the new plugin as you would use the old plugin, there would
>> have been no bugs. This bnd plugin has considerably more horse power. The
>> plugin allows you to control the manifest headers in very fine grained
>> detail, something that was not possible with the old. Most errors we
>> found were actually verification issues, the plugin was sometimes a
>> bit too pedantic and overzealous in checking.
>>
>> So I would definitely go for the bnd based plugin, I promise to fix
>> anything quickly when you run into an issue.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Peter Kriens
>>
>>
>> PN> Hi gang,
>> PN> we are wondering which Maven OSGi plugin we should bet on when
>> PN> starting to make some changes to support things like Require-Bundle
>> PN> statements etc from the POM? Peters BND sounds very nice but it seems
>> PN> the older one is more stable etc etc.
>>
>> PN> Cheers
>>
>> PN> /peter
>>
>> --
>> Peter Kriens Tel +33467542167
>> 9C, Avenue St. Drézéry AOL,Yahoo: pkriens
>> 34160 Beaulieu, France ICQ 255570717
>> Skype pkriens Fax +1 8153772599
>>
>>
--
Peter Kriens Tel +33467542167
9C, Avenue St. Drézéry AOL,Yahoo: pkriens
34160 Beaulieu, France ICQ 255570717
Skype pkriens Fax +1 8153772599
