"Steven E. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My intention here is that the Configuration property "some.prop" will > be assigned to the component field "someProp", and the current value > of someProp will be exhibited back out as a service property.
I did notice that earlier in ConfigurationHandler.configure(), around line 112, some of the same name/fieldName/configuration inspection goes on, this time favoring only String-typed configuration property values. We make it all the way down to line 127 where cd.addProperty(new PropertyDescription(... gets called. However, the field in my component never gets set to the configuration property value. Should the field be set eventually? -- Steven E. Harris
