A proposal: pkgVersion: 1.0RC1, 1.0RC2, 0.8-alpha osgiVersion: 1.0.0.RC1, 1.0.0.RC2, 0.8.0.alpha
looks fine to me. On 3/13/07, Stefano Lenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alin Dreghiciu wrote: > Take a look at an example: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-240 > I had to add a new property: osgiVersion because pakage version does not > always conforms to osgi format. As in the example above the package > was 2.2but becasue of the pom version and snapshot the version will be > 2.2.0001-SNAPSHOT which is invalid. so the osgi version reuses the package > version and adds .0 > What about if we have to wrap jars that use "named version" like: 1.0RC1, 1.0RC2, 0.8-alpha, etc ? Is that a real issue? Or we are speaking about only of Maven artifact so none of the jars will have a "named version". Stefano Lenzi
