Well actually what you said (and what I originally said) is wrong. Please read the linked message.
BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1 386 848 3788 Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-04-16 10:01 Please respond to felix-dev@incubator.apache.org To felix-dev@incubator.apache.org cc Subject Re: 101.6.4 of R4.1? Service Compendium On Monday 16 April 2007 16:35, Dale Peakall wrote: > This message from BJ Hargrave: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00201.html refers > to section 101.6.4 of the specification. This doesn't appear in my > version of the service compendium so I assume its a 4.1 thing? Although > as far as I was aware 4.1 only affected the core specification. Anyway, > it's going to be difficult to update the LogService implementation > without knowing what it's supposed to do. Can someone point me in the > appropriate direction. And the issue was; The text is written in a way that make it look like the Log Service is expected to send the events via the Event Admin service (if present). The proper text should indicate that; The Event Admin service (if present) must register with LogReaderService and send the log events as standard Event Admin events. So, if you implement LogReaderService and do nothing regarding the Event Admin, then you are doing the right thing. Cheers Niclas
