On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 12:32 +0100, Rhythmic Fistman wrote:

> Not quite - the c10k problem is to do with serving thousands of clients,
> i.e. disk->network traffic. felix's considerable contribution to this has been
> the complete removal of the scheduler consideration*, pushing the
> issue back to the OS's
> socket/disk IO implementation and related readiness interfaces**. 

That's right. And that is why we probably need to use a single
raw socket on port 80, and re-implement the required part of
the TCP/IP protocol on top of that: potential commercial project
for Async P/L.


-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language

Reply via email to