skaller wrote:
> So for example we might be able to do
>
> module X {
> statement while expr do statements done #=> ...;
> }
>
> without the current hackery. In particular
>
> open X;
>
> could make the syntax extensions available, instead of
>
> #import <something.flxh>
>
> we have to use now (and which doesn't work so well!)
>
> Changing the packaging system is something to look at,
> all the includes and headers etc are too hard -- I can't
> get the right myself :)
>
Oh that looks very nice. I hope that parser works out for us! If it
does, would that mean we could get rid of elkhound?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
