On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:12 AM, john skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why fork it? Why not a single compiler with a switch?
Eventually I want to do that, but it's a lot easier to hack out all the c++ stuff and replace it with llvm stuff. So, it's completely incompatible. I didn't want my experiment with it to cause other problems. In the long run, I'm hoping to merge it back in once I can figure out a way to make it a compiler switch. I'm planning on merging bug fixes between the two branches when I find them, and I hope not to keep the two that far from each other. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
