On 05/04/2009, at 2:13 AM, Emmanuel Onzon wrote:
>
> Unfortunately this makes a real mess of expression RHS. You have to
> write:
>
> expr [term] = expr[term] + expr[<term];
>
> to get left associativity and the right precendences (or is that
> right assoc ?)
>
> This is left assoc, since expr of priority term are not allowed
> on the right side of +.
Argument is fallacious :) Since it would also be the case if I wrote
>term.
I always get confused by ordering: if
x < y
which has the higher priority, x or y? If like integers, y is bigger,
though I usually associate bigger integers with lower priority!
But the notation also suggest x is "above" y in a lattice.
And indeed for boolean
x < y MEANS x implies y
that is
x --> y
which is not at all intuitive. Anyhow just a rant ... :)
[Erick said he was missing them so, here's one for
him to enjoy on the weekend :->
--
john skaller
skal...@users.sourceforge.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
