2011/2/2 john skaller <skal...@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> On 03/02/2011, at 12:45 AM, Emmanuel Onzon wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > here are the changes:
> >
>
>
> BTW: using StackOverflow the reason for Marshal failure of Felix automaton
> now seems to be that OCS Scheme contains un-Marshalable WeakArray... ;(
>
Ok,
I'm guessing a version of the parsing_device that doesn't contain any user
action would be marshalable. One can imagine marshaling the parsing_device
without the user actions. After loading it, it would be necessary to attach
the user actions to it. For instance Felix could resubmit all the couples
(rule, user action), then dypgen wouldn't have to build the automaton but
would use the couples to attach the user actions to the parsing device.
To do this you would need dypgen to return the current parsing_device
without the user actions and a function that would attach the user actions
to the parsing_device.
What do you think about this?
Emmanuel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
