On 15/11/2012, at 1:06 PM, Dobes Vandermeer wrote:
> Well consider a type class:
>
> class Widget[T] {virtual draw(w:T...) ;} ;
> instance Widget [button] { draw(w:button...){...} } ;
>
> Wouldn't it be nice if you could do:
>
> val b = makeButton () ;
> val w = b as Widget;
> draw(w,...) ;
>
> The compiler can generate a record type with all the virtual functions of
> Widget in it and an instance of Widget for that record type that delegates
> each virtual method to the matching member function. Then you have some
> syntax "x as Widget" to construct that record from any other type that has an
> implementation of Widget available.
Yes, I understood that because I've had the same "desire" myself.
What I don't understand is exactly what this means in a theoretical sense.
--
john skaller
[email protected]
http://felix-lang.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
