On 10/02/2013, at 9:26 PM, James Dennett wrote:
>>
>> ((::std::string*)(&tmp))->::std::basic_string<char>::~basic_string<char>();
> I think it's a gcc 4.6.3 bug that it doesn't accept your original
> code, but that's overcomplicated code anyway.
Yeah. But I tried a lot of other things and that one "worked for me".
It took hours to get something that worked at all (on my Mac).
>
> Here are some options that work with gcc 4.6.3 and clang 3.0 at least:
> ((::std::string*)(&tmp))->std::basic_string<char>::~basic_string();
> ((::std::string*)(&tmp))->~basic_string<char>();
> ((::std::string*)(&tmp))->~basic_string();
> Qualification is unnecessary as the lookup starts in ::std::string,
Ah good point.
> and the injected class name is implicitly basic_string<char>.
So you can drop the "char". Weird though:
string *px = ...
px -> ~basic_string();
declare it as a string .. destroy as a basic_string :)
--
john skaller
[email protected]
http://felix-lang.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
