On 02/03/2014, at 2:28 PM, srean wrote:
>
> And so it is in Felix. For example if you want this to work:
>
> proc closure () { println$ i; }
>
> Shouldnt this be an error unless there is an i accessible at this point ?
Yep, left it out ..
> If not this is too macro'ish
>
> for i in 0 to 9 do
> a . i = closure;
> done
and of course the syntax is
for i in 0 upto 9 do ..
[upto not to]
The point of all this is: variables, as used in Algol and C are crap.
The idea is completely inconsistent.
--
john skaller
skal...@users.sourceforge.net
http://felix-lang.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer
Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports.
Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
