patti, hon, i don't know what you're quoting from, because i think that's phaewyrn's terminology, not mine, and even if it were, i'm pretty sure i didn't have anything to say about it yesterday!
my feelings have been noted before--as have yours and phaewyrn's. we disagree. i think there are FAR worse choices than science diet-- and if we're gonna stop using everything that has or is suspected of having carcinogens in them, we may as well just give up, because we're living in a time of such corporate irresponsibility and lack of ethics that there would be rat poison in human food if it meant production costs were lower and the manufacturers thought they wouldn't be caught. i know of far more cats who have died from bacterially caused illness from being fed raw diets than can be linked to science diet... it's just NOT black and white. MC On 3/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a message dated 3/24/07 3:04:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Science Diet CRAP? It has been proven that Science Diet (&Eukanuba) use a preservative known to be a carsinogenative...... Patti & her gang ------------------------------ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at *AOL.com* <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000339>.
-- Spay & Neuter Your Neighbors! Maybe That'll Make The Difference.... MaryChristine AIM / YAHOO: TenHouseCats MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 289856892
