Yes, I agree now. I was concerned last night, but now that I think about it, one person in such a large organization as BF certainly does not represent the whole; although, I think they should do their best to obtain moderators who espouse their beliefs, but it doesn't always work that way!
Melissa -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pam Norman Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:47 AM To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org Subject: Re: Killing cats who pee on RUGS***** This is a good point & I wouldn't abandon BF just because of some moderator's comments. Altho Marion Hale has been there a LONG time. I don't know about Gina, but Marion has been there at LEAST 10 years. And NEVER been to the sanctuary! I think to be a moderator that should be mandatory! Kelley Saveika wrote: > On 5/29/07, Melissa Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> However, now I'm quite frightened about Best Friends. I'm going to >> write to >> my contact there about this. >> >> Melissa >> > Melissa, > > I understand your fear, but I *personally* would not be concerned. > That forum is on the Best Friends Network, which is provided by them > as a service and is not their "official" stance on anything. There is > a disclaimer - "Content is posted freely by website members and may or > may not reflect the opinions, goals, or mission of BFAS." It is > largely volunteer run (I know the volunteer who edits the Texas > community) and there may be a rogue moderator. Certainly I don't > think it has a thing to do with how they take care of their animals. >
