Argh. Think I did that a few places.
1. okt. 2013 19:52 skrev "Kirby, Rob" <[email protected]> følgende:
> Dictionary comprehension is only in Python 2.7 and some flavors of 3.
>
> Converting this to
>
> sv2av = dict( [ (j,i) for i,j in enumerate(arg_indices) ] )
>
> would be fine in other versions with only slightly more clutter in the
> notation.
>
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
> > I'm getting an error with Uflacs and Python 2.6:
> >
> > sv2av = { j:i for i,j in enumerate(arg_indices) }
> > ^
> > SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> >
> > Seems ok with Python 2.7/
> >
> > Garth
> >
> >
> > On 30 September 2013 10:36, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I am not sure actually. I think that some of the tests uses 2.6
> features.
> >>
> >> Note also that the string formatting is different in 2.6 and 2.7. Most
> note
> >> worthy IMO is that you cannot write:
> >>
> >> "func({})".format(4)
> >>
> >> but need to include the positional too:
> >>
> >> "func({0})".format(4)
> >>
> >> which can become quite tedious for longer statements.
> >>
> >> BTW: if we settle on have 2.6 as the minimum requirement, which I think
> is
> >> fine, we need to check that at compile time, which I am pretty sure we
> do
> >> not do today.
> >>
> >> Johan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Martin Sandve Alnæs <
> [email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We do require at least python 2.6 now, right?
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to gradually start using the new string formatting.
> >>>
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> fenics mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> fenics mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Garth N. Wells
> > Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
> > http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/~gnw20
> > _______________________________________________
> > fenics mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
