Great, I'd like that fix to be in 1.3.

UFL is good, none of the issues are for 1.3. Note that ufl/next contains
merges that should not go into 1.3.

Same for ffc/next, but I'm looking to see if there are some things in
ffc/next that _should_ be in master.

Martin


On 20 November 2013 12:49, Øyvind Evju <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm hoping to push a fix to this one:
>
>
> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/155/boundarymesh-generates-a-mesh-with-too-few
>
>
> -Øyvind
>
>
> 2013/11/20 Johannes Ring <[email protected]>
>
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:14:39PM +0100, Jan Blechta wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:59:38 +0100
>> >> Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Is it only this one?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/10/nonlinearvariationalsolver-does-not-pass
>> >>
>> >> And this one, I guess
>> >>
>> >> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/149/test-vtk6
>> >
>> > ok. I can fix the first one. Any progress on the second (VTK)?
>>
>> I will take a look.
>>
>> Johannes
>> _______________________________________________
>> fenics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to