On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:33:41PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 07:58:51AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:32:53PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: > > > Wasn't the deal that we should merge UFC into FFC, and not the > other way > > > around? > > > > Yes, of course. At least I got it right in the issue... > > > > > Before we switch from cmake to distutils in ufc I suggest we make > the > > > shared_ptr switch in UFC/DOLFIN. I can take responsibility for > this > > switch in > > > the SWIG layer. > > > > Great, that's the hard part. I could do the switch in UFC and DOLFIN > > but I'm not sure it would help. I expect many things will break > until > > the SWIG layer is fixed. > > > > > > Sure no Python tests will run until we have the SWIG layer in place. > > > > > > Would it help if I switched in UFC + DOLFIN (except for SWIG) and > > pushed to new branches, or is it just as easy to run dolfinreplace? > > > > > > A lot of things can be done with dolfiunreplace, but things are bound to > go > > wrong. So if you make the switch in the DOLFIN/UFC/FFC C++ layer first > and at > > least make everything compile. I also suggest that you get the C++ code > > generation in-place too before we fix the SWIG layer. > > I have made the switch on the C++ side in UFC and DOLFIN branches > > logg/topic-c++11 > > > Ok, I will have a look at the SWIG layer later this week.
ok, great. Who knows distutils best? Perhaps Johannes could look at the switch from CMake to distutils in UFC? -- Anders _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
