At least to plot the same function to the same window.
Maybe it only needs the function.id()?

Martin


On 29 April 2014 09:49, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 28 Apr 2014, at 20:05, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 06:46:14PM +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >> We have a memory leak in the plotting code because the class
> GenericVTKPlottable does not have a (virtual) destructor. The consequence
> is that for objects like VTKPlottableGenericFunction, their destructor is
> never called. This problem was picked up by a static analysis tool.
> >>
> >> In GenericVTKPlottable, the destructor was commented out with the
> message:
> >>
> >>    // This destructor should be uncommented, but it causes a problem
> >>    // in parallel with MPI calls being made after MPI is shutdown. Needs
> >>    // further investigation.
> >>
> >> This should have been sorted out. The problem is that the code skips
> over the plot command, and shuts down MPI before the plot code has
> destroyed all of its objects (some of which depend on MPI). We’re back in a
> situation where the automatic initialisation and finalisation of MPI isn't
> work. Solutions are
> >>
> >> 1. Require MPI to be initialised and finalised manually by the user
> (the most robust option)
> >> 2. Do not allow plotting with MPI
> >> 3. Something else?
> >>
> >> Opinions or suggestions?
> >
> > Will it really help to finalize MPI explicitly in this case?
> >
> > Isn't the problem plots that are active until someone presses 'q' or
> > the program exits? The call to the destructor of the plot objects will
> > still happen late, and finalizing MPI *sooner* wont't make that
> > problem go away.
> >
>
> Maybe. I’d have to test.
>
> I should have added that the problem only appears from Python.
>
> > What seems to be needed in this case is something like this:
> >
> >  plot_finalize(); // just as ugly as mpi_finalize()
> >
>
> Why does the plot code need to store a Function object? If it didn’t store
> a Function, this problem would vanish.
>
> Garth
>
>
> > --
> > Anders
>
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to