Thanks, looks like we have concensus on this. -- Anders
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:27:27PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: > Ok by me. > > On 22 October 2014 14:20, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, thanks. I agree with both yours and Garth's comments. The original > form should be the default choice. > > I'll be adding the new form to the web archive (but without an > explicit link). > > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0100, David Ham wrote: > > I agree with Garth. Legally it's fine, you just have to make sure that > you > > don't forget about the end date if the institution keeps contributing. > > > > > > On 16 October 2014 18:38, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have received a patch from a contributor whose employer is not > able > > to sign the institution copyright consent form other than for a > > limited period of time. (The time limitation is for the period of > > contribution, not for the period of the validity of the license > which > > is indefinite.) I have therefore prepared a suggestion for a limited > > version of the institution copyright consent form: > > > > http://www.math.chalmers.se/~logg/tmp/letter-institution-limited.pdf > > > > Does this look ok? Can we add this as a possible alternative for > > institutions to sign? > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > fenics mailing list > [email protected] > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
