On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Could you or someone else build FEniCS with fenics-install.sh (takes time
> but is presumably automatic) and compare?
I got 53s with the Debian packages and 1m5s with the HashDist based
installation.
> The alternative would be for me to build FEniCS manually but that takes a
> lot of manual effort and it's not clear I can make a "good" build. It would
> be good to get a number, not only to check for a possible regression but
> also to test whether something is suboptimal in the HashDist build.
>
> Johannes, is the HashDist build with optimization?
DOLFIN is built with CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release. The flags for building
PETSc is listed below.
Johannes
PETSc flags for Debian package:
PETSC_DIR=/tmp/src/petsc-3.4.2.dfsg1 PETSC_ARCH=linux-gnu-c-opt \
./config/configure.py --with-shared-libraries --with-debugging=0 \
--useThreads 0 --with-clanguage=C++ --with-c-support \
--with-fortran-interfaces=1 \
--with-mpi-dir=/usr/lib/openmpi --with-mpi-shared=1 \
--with-blas-lib=-lblas --with-lapack-lib=-llapack \
--with-blacs=1 --with-blacs-include=/usr/include \
--with-blacs-lib=[/usr/lib/libblacsCinit-openmpi.so,/usr/lib/libblacs-openmpi.so]
\
--with-scalapack=1 --with-scalapack-include=/usr/include \
--with-scalapack-lib=/usr/lib/libscalapack-openmpi.so \
--with-mumps=1 --with-mumps-include=/usr/include \
--with-mumps-lib=[/usr/lib/libdmumps.so,/usr/lib/libzmumps.so,/usr/lib/libsmumps.so,/usr/lib/libcmumps.so,/usr/lib/libmumps_common.so,/usr/lib/libpord.so]
\
--with-umfpack=1 --with-umfpack-include=/usr/include/suitesparse \
--with-umfpack-lib=[/usr/lib/libumfpack.so,/usr/lib/libamd.so] \
--with-cholmod=1 --with-cholmod-include=/usr/include/suitesparse \
--with-cholmod-lib=/usr/lib/libcholmod.so \
--with-spooles=1 --with-spooles-include=/usr/include/spooles \
--with-spooles-lib=/usr/lib/libspooles.so \
--with-hypre=1 --with-hypre-dir=/usr \
--with-ptscotch=1 --with-ptscotch-include=/usr/include/scotch \
--with-ptscotch-lib=[/usr/lib/libptesmumps.so,/usr/lib/libptscotch.so,/usr/lib/libptscotcherr.so]
\
--with-fftw=1 --with-fftw-include=/usr/include \
--with-fftw-lib=[/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3.so,/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3_mpi.so]
\
--with-hdf5=1 --with-hdf5-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/hdf5/openmpi
--CXX_LINKER_FLAGS="-Wl,--no-as-needed"
PETSc flags for HashDist based build:
mkdir ${PWD}/_tmp && TMPDIR=${PWD}/_tmp \
./configure --prefix="${ARTIFACT}" \
COPTFLAGS=-O2 \
--with-shared-libraries=1 \
--with-debugging=0 \
--with-ssl=0 \
--with-blas-lapack-lib=${OPENBLAS_DIR}/lib/libopenblas.so \
--with-metis-dir=$PARMETIS_DIR \
--with-parmetis-dir=$PARMETIS_DIR \
--with-scotch-dir=${SCOTCH_DIR} \
--with-ptscotch-dir=${SCOTCH_DIR} \
--with-suitesparse=1 \
--with-suitesparse-include=${SUITESPARSE_DIR}/include/suitesparse \
--with-suitesparse-lib=[${SUITESPARSE_DIR}/lib/libumfpack.a,libklu.a,libcholmod.a,libbtf.a,libccolamd.a,libcolamd.a,libcamd.a,libamd.a,libsuitesparseconfig.a]
\
--with-hypre=1 \
--with-hypre-include=${HYPRE_DIR}/include \
--with-hypre-lib=${HYPRE_DIR}/lib/libHYPRE.so \
--with-mpi-compilers \
CC=$MPICC \
CXX=$MPICXX \
F77=$MPIF77 \
F90=$MPIF90 \
FC=$MPIF90 \
--with-patchelf-dir=$PATCHELF_DIR \
--with-python-dir=$PYTHON_DIR \
--with-superlu_dist-dir=$SUPERLU_DIST_DIR \
--download-mumps=1 \
--download-scalapack=1 \
--download-blacs=1 \
--download-ml=1
> --
> Anders
>
>
> mån 30 mars 2015 kl 17:05 skrev Garth N. Wells <[email protected]>:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > See this question on the QA forum:
>> >
>> >
>> > http://fenicsproject.org/qa/6875/ubuntu-compile-from-source-which-provide-better-performance
>> >
>> > The Cahn-Hilliard demo takes 40 seconds with 1.3 Ubuntu packages and 52
>> > seconds with 1.5+ built from source. Are these regressions in
>> > performance or
>> > is Johannes that much better at building Debian packages than I am
>> > building
>> > FEniCS (with HashDist).
>> >
>>
>> With the 1.4 Ubuntu package (Ubuntu 14.10), I get 42s. With my build
>> of the dev version (I don't use Hashdist) I get 34s.
>>
>> Garth
>>
>> > PS: Looking at the benchbot, there seem to have been some regressions in
>> > the
>> > timing facilities with the recent changes:
>> >
>> > http://fenicsproject.org/benchbot/
>> >
>> > --
>> > Anders
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > fenics mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
