On 28 October 2011 14:12, Benjamin Kehlet <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/10/28 Marie E. Rognes <[email protected]>: >> On 10/28/2011 12:06 PM, Anders Logg wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> There has been some concern regarding the lack of predictability in >>> FEniCS releases. Yesterday, some of us at Simula met to discuss what >>> can be done to improve the situation. The result is the following >>> draft for a future development model: >>> >>> http://fenicsproject.org/contributing/development_model.html >>> >>> Please comment on the draft and suggest corrections. >>> >>> The new development model calls for a "release manager" to coordinate >>> each stable release (currently 1.0). I can volunteer to serve as >>> release manager this time. I'd be happy to step aside if someone else >>> is motivated. >>> >>> I know some of you, in particular those from Simula who helped draft >>> the proposal, have already said OK, but please respond anyway for the >>> record. >>> >> >> >> Anders: thanks for summarizing and volunteering! >> >> I think this looks good, and definitely something to try out. In particular, >> I think that the combination of lightweight (snapshot) and heavyweight >> (stable) releases could be a good way to span the range of priorities and >> focii within the development group. >> >> -- >> Marie > > > Agree. Looks good. > > Benjamin
Looks good. Martin _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
