On 13 December 2011 18:57, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:47:10AM +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: >> Hi, >> UFC has a series/branch 2.0.x. Just to be clear, this >> should be maintained to match the 1.0.x branches of >> dolfin/ffc/ufl, corresponding to the book, right? > > Yes, that was the plan. I tried to make it as uniform as possible, > with the 2.0.x branch correspondingt to the other 1.0.x branches. > >> And the next breaking change will be e.g. ufc 2.1.x matching dolfin >> 1.1.x. > > I'm not sure. I have been thinking about UFC 3 as the next big change > of UFC. So it might depend on which changes we make. Say that we > fix the currently broken quadrature version of tabulate_tensor for > interior_facet_integral and maybe modify some functions to take > physical coordinates rather than reference coordinates (or the > opposite...) then maybe thas is 2.1. But if we make some bigger > changes, then we may jump to 3.0. >
I think that we need some time for 3.0. It would be good to minimise the number of released that have substantial changes, so we need to think about a lot of things before 3.0. I'm happy for the fixes to tabulate_tensor, real vs mapped coordinates, etc to become 2.1. Garth > -- > Anders > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
