On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:43:14PM +0200, Marie E. Rognes wrote: > On 04/15/2013 02:37 PM, Anders Logg wrote: > >I suggest we adopt the "gitworkflows" development model as described here: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitworkflows.html > > > >(Can also be read by the command 'man 7 gitworkflows'.) > > > >In more detail, I suggest we > > > >- create 'maint', 'master', 'next' branches in the official repository > > > >- skip the 'pu' branch for now > > > >- publish topic branches in personal repositories > > > >- follow the "gitworkflows" model otherwise > > > >Core developers should read up on the description of gitworkflows and > >comment. Any objections to adopting this model? > > > >The main motivation is that this is a standard model used by many > >other projects, including our PETSc friends who can share their > >experience and give us pointers when we stumble. > > So, you are referring to the PETSc model as described here: > > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/wiki/developer-instructions-git > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/wiki/quick-dev-git > > as suggested earlier by Garth? Sounds good to me.
No, I'm referring to https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitworkflows.html minus the 'pu' branch. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
