So you mean it makes sense for each developer that has at least two topic branches?
-- Anders On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:15:32PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: > Partly true, but from a personal workflow p.o.v. it still makes sense > to me: > > - work in local mytopic > - keep local master in sync by pulling > - pull master into local next and merge mytopic into local next and > test before merging mytopic into master and pushing > > If you have several local topic branches you can merge them into next > separately or together for testing, then later merge them one at a time > into master for integration. > > Martin > > Den 17. apr. 2013 14:08 skrev "Anders Logg" <[1][email protected]> > følgende: > > One thing though is that it perhaps doesn't make sense to create the > 'next' branch at this point, until it is being tested by the > buildbot? > I think Johannes is working on getting it running. > > Referenser > > 1. mailto:[email protected] > 2. mailto:[email protected] > 3. https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitworkflows.html > 4. https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/wiki/developer-instructions-git > 5. https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/wiki/quick-dev-git > 6. https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitworkflows.html > 7. https://launchpad.net/~fenics > 8. mailto:[email protected] > 9. https://launchpad.net/~fenics > 10. https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > 11. https://launchpad.net/~fenics > 12. mailto:[email protected] > 13. https://launchpad.net/~fenics > 14. https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
