On 3/21/07, Thomas Senf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to thank all the people who have contributed to this very
> fine project. Great work!
>
> I've encountered some strange results while examining the term frequency
> of one of my indexed documents. The indexed terms seem to vary for the
> very same document depending on the presence or absence of completely
> unrelated operations in the code, so the resulting term frequency
> changes, too.
>
> I repeatedly call 'index_reader.term_docs_for' for the only document
> I've indexed in the snippet below, but depending on the presence of the
> statement
> 'dummy_count = 0' or some formatting code for the output the resulting
> term frequencies change from correct answers to wrong ones. Sometimes
> terms are not
> found at all.
>
> For better examination I add a complete snippet which produce this
> behavior on my system (the text is taken from
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entgelt). I'm
> working with ferret Version 0.11.3, C extensions compiled with VC6.0
> (but the 0.10.9-mswin32 binaries from the ferret gem show the same
> behavior), and ruby
> version 1.8.5.
>
> Has anybody an explanation for that or do I misuse something?
> <snip>Test Code</snip>

Hi Thomas,

Firstly, well done compiling Ferret on Windows and thanks for posting
this. The reason I haven't yet released a win32 gem is that I'm still
trying to work out the String#dump issue which is wreaking havoc when
people try and use Ferret with Rails on Windows. I suspect this issue
of yours is somehow related. I'll let you know as soon as I find a
solution.

Cheers,
Dave

-- 
Dave Balmain
http://www.davebalmain.com/
_______________________________________________
Ferret-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk

Reply via email to