On 5/8/07, Jens Kraemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:35:48AM +0200, Jens Kraemer wrote:
> [..]
> > > acts_as_ferret({:fields => {:name => {:boost => 10},
> > > :type => {:boost => 2},
> > > :email => {:boost => 10},
> > > :bio => {:store => :no},
> > > :status_id => {:boost => 1}},
> > > :store_class_name => true,
> > > :remote => true,
> > > :ferret => { :analyzer =>
> > > Ferret::Analysis::StandardAnalyzer.new([]) }
> > > } )
> > >
>
> I just committed a fix so that the above call should be working
> correctly now. I'd go so far to say that this should be the preferred
> way of passing ferret options to aaf now. The two-hash calling style I
> suggested below will still work of course, so nothing should break.
Hi Jens,
This is excellent. It works well in my initial testing. I think it's
a great way to go.
Thanks for your great support,
Doug
_______________________________________________
Ferret-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
