Jens Kraemer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:16:49PM +0200, Mattias Bud wrote:
>> > AAF trunk now should handle this correctly :-)
>> something here.
> if this date string is in the date_comment_index field, you won't find
> it as long as you say :index => :no. The correct choice for fields you
> want to search, but not to be tokenized is :index => :untokenized.
>
> :index => :no is only useful for fields you never want to search, but
> which should hold data to be retrieved later on.
>
> Jens
>
Yes - I ran into that. After a lot of tests I now use
untokenized_omit_norms which seems to give the correct result. Now I
only have to index the date_comment twice. It also holds unsurten dates
lite Around 1820. These chould be searchable with "Around" (find al
unsurten dates)
So now I index
:date_comment_index => {},
:date_comment_index_untokenized => {:index => :untokenized_omit_norms}
mattias
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_______________________________________________
Ferret-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
