[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk) wrote, > Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:04:43 -0700, Alastair Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > > > > Should these functions be available through the standard FFI? > > > IMHO they should. > > > > I don't understand the question. > > Are you asking which modules should export them? > > Yes. IMHO they should be made as "standard" as the rest of FFI > and exported from module Foreign. I guess, you could a (maybe inefficient) version of unsafePerformIO using the FFI functionality anyway. This gives us a default implementation, so I thing, we should include it. I am not so sure about unsafeInterleaveIO. Manuel _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
- unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Alastair Reid
- Re: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInter... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Fergus Henderson
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Simon Marlow
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInter... Alastair Reid
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeI... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: unsafePerformIO and un... Alastair Reid
- Re: RE: unsafePerformI... malcolm-ffi
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Simon Marlow
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Alastair Reid
