Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > Simon Marlow wrote: > > A totally minor point, but 'wincall' doesn't feel right. [...] > > I'd stick with 'stdcall' because that's what everyone else seems to call > > it. gcc has a 'stdcall' function attribute, BTW. > > OK, so let's forget about 'wincall' and continue using 'stdcall'. > Inventing new names for things already in existence is not a very > good plan. As I seem to be the only one who is really against stdcall, let's revert to it *sigh* Manuel _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
- Re: FFI Definition Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: FFI Definition Sven Panne
- Re: FFI Definition Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: FFI Definition Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: FFI Definition Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: FFI Definition Sven Panne
- Re: Revised FFI syntax + typing Sven Panne
- Re: Revised FFI syntax + typing Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Revised FFI syntax + typing Alastair Reid
- RE: Revised FFI syntax + typing Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Revised FFI syntax + typing Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Revised FFI syntax + typing Alastair Reid
- RE: Revised FFI syntax + typing Simon Marlow
- Re: Revised FFI syntax + typing Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Revised FFI syntax + typing Alastair Reid