> So let's simply say: The contents of the include part of
> extent are implictly
> wrapped into double quotes iff they don't start with '<' or
> '"', and no ".h"
> is appended. Easy rule, doesn't mix concepts, and is readable:
>
> foreign import ccall "static !myproc myinclude.h" myProc :: ...
I agree: don't make the '.h' implicit. To me it looks much more
readable when it's obvious which is the cid and which is the include.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
FFI mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
- RE: Again: FFI syntax Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Again: FFI syntax Simon Marlow
- Re: Again: FFI Syntax Sven Panne
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Sven Panne
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Fergus Henderson
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Fergus Henderson
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Fergus Henderson
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Simon Marlow
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Sven Panne
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Sven Panne
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Fergus Henderson
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Sven Panne
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Again: FFI syntax Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
